“If we wanted applause, we’d have joined the circus.”
There’s a little boy and on his 14th birthday he gets a horse… and everybody in the village says, “how wonderful. The boy got a horse” And the Zen master says, “we’ll see.” Two years later, the boy falls off the horse, breaks his leg, and everyone in the village says, “How terrible.” And the Zen master says, “We’ll see.” Then, a war breaks out and all the young men have to go off and fight… except the boy can’t cause his legs all messed up. and everybody in the village says, “How wonderful.”
Now the Zen master says, “We’ll see.”
ARGO begins in 1979 during the Iranian Revolution. It’s then that a group of revolutionaries storm the American embassy in Tehran and take the people there as hostages in response to America’s harbouring of their recently deposed Shah. During the mayhem, six Americans escape out a back door and manage to find refuge in the residence of the Canadian ambassador to Iran, Ken Taylor (Victor Garber). When the American government learn the six have escaped, they decide to launch a mission to get those six out as fast as possible.
The question to be answered is “how”?
Enter Jack O’Donnell (Bryan Cranston) and CIA specialist Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck). Acting as consultants, they immediately shoot down half-assed ideas that will almost surely get the six hostages killed, but can’t immediately offer a better idea. As Tony talks on the phone with his son one night, the idea presents itself in the form of bad 1970′s sci-fi. Tony pitches the idea that a fake sci-fi film will go into production, he’ll get into Iran himself, and all seven will pose as a Canadian film crew scouting locations for the project. It’s a bad idea, but it’s by far the best bad idea the CIA has.
With the idea approved, Tony then jets to Hollywood to build the cover story. He teams up with Hollywood make-up wizard John Chambers (John Goodman), and mid-level producer Lester Siegel (Alan Arkin) to find a script to fuel their elaborate lie. The trio discover a script titled ARGO set on Mars, so the palaces and deserts of the middle east will compliment their ruse perfectly. As just enough pre-production on ARGO begins, Tony heads to the Middle East to sneak into Iran.
Oh, did I neglect to mention that the six hostages don’t know a thing about this?
ARGO is a film that is all about the viewing experience, and less about trying to reinvent the wheel. Perhaps the greatest evidence of that comes with its subject matter; a 33-year-old story that many in the audience know the end of. The story isn’t so much “Will the hostages escape?” so much as it is “What will happen when they make their escape?”. Because of this, the whole experience comes down to execution. Again, I don’t think the execution is anything revolutionary, but it is on-point and does a good job of enrapturing an audience who are likely familiar with the road they are walking down.
One of the things that is fascinating about ARGO, is how it celebrates that so much is done in our world without the desire for credit. While they might not have the crazy cover of involving a movie production, things are being done everyday to keep us safe. They involve co-operation and professionalism, and a complete disregard for ego. In many ways they are like baseball umpires: If they do a good job, nobody knows their name – but screw something up, and suddenly all eyes are on them. This type of M-O is rare in the world; to do a job – and do it well – without want or need of an ‘attaboy’.
The other thing that’s interesting is the way it paints the role of Iran. At a glance, ARGO seems like a story of getting the innocent out of the reaches of a harmful aggressor – when in truth that isn’t the case. Remind yourself, that the entire reason for the uprising was the fact that America was harbouring a deposed leader whose homeland was asking for his extradition to stand for his crimes. While we find ourselves back in a place where relations between the west and the middle east are again tense, this movie doesn’t play into propaganda. While Iran’s actions might not have been the best route to take for social justice, the film doesn’t demonize them and make them seem like monsters. The risk the CIA and the six hostages take isn’t underplayed, but it’s a risk that is run by the fact that they are running a sneak play…not because they are in the right.
The way the film blends these ideas, along with some wry humour is what makes ARGO play so well. It has different movements, which while rather different all work in concert by the time all is done. Any film that can employ the fear of driving through an Iranian protest with the silliness of a phrase like “Argo Fuck Yourself” is certainly doing something right. It begins as what my friends call a “File Cabinet Movie”, momentarily becomes mildly farcical, takes a turn towards the procedural, and ends with a gripping sequence of ‘will-they or won’t-they?’. Bring all of those together in most films and they feel like a tonal mess; ARGO meanwhile moves from one to the other with grace.
I brought up that quote off the top of this piece because history has a funny way of continually twisting itself into something different. As things unfold, with the whole world watching, the details might seem black and white. It’s only with the passing of time – and the full scope of truth & consequences – that we can understand where things went well, and where they were royally screwed. I have no theory to offer here on how we could ever learn from our mistakes, just making a curious observation on the cost between the extraction of these six hostages, and the extraction of the remaining 60+.
Ask your parents kids.
12 comments
Brittani says:
Oct 22, 2012
Great review! I absolutely loved this film. Easily Affleck’s best.
Ryan McNeil says:
Oct 24, 2012
It’s been fascinating to see him evolve as a director so quickly. I just rewatched THE TOWN last night, and even there you could see a lot of promise on what was coming.
Jess says:
Oct 22, 2012
I agree, it’s Affleck’s best directing work and easily his best acting. Great review Ryan. Did it play well for a Canadian audience?
Ryan McNeil says:
Oct 24, 2012
Funny, I found that his acting was only “OK” – but I think that was by design with him wanting to put more attention on actors like the hostages, along with the broader story itself.
The Sunday afternoon crowd I saw it with ate it up. It was a full house, and it even got a mild round of applause at the end. Having seen it now, I actually wish I was part of that TIFF showing you attended because I can only imagine how well it played *that* afternoon!
Andrew says:
Oct 26, 2012
I think there’s something to make of the connection and relationship between Hollywood and the CIA here, and in the ways Argo perceives Hollywood as an entity. Which is to say, I think Argo has an enormous number of layers to it that make it something truly special. I’m a fan of Gone Baby Gone and The Town, though I think the latter is uneven and at times far too pat, but this to me is another level for Affleck– it’s absolutely a whole new stage, something larger than he’s ever worked on before. If nothing else the film deserves commendation for ambition.
But it’s tight, very, very well-paced and brimming with tension as the stakes build at a constant clip over the course of its running time, and so Argo succeeds on that end as well. Affleck makes getting through airport security one of the most nailbiting sequences I’ve seen in a film all year, even if things get a little silly with a somewhat absurd runway chase. (Though I’d argue that just reflects the sort of ridiculousness that Hollywood deals in.)
Also dug Affleck here, which is saying something because he rarely registers to me as an actor. I’m thinking that he should probably start casting leading men aside from himself in his future pictures, but he works here in conjunction with his gigantic cast that’s too big to go through and praise on a 1-on-1 basis.
Ryan McNeil says:
Oct 28, 2012
I think you touch on a big part of what made the film work for me too; the way it blends the escape plot with the hollywood plot. There’s a wry humour in the latter that helps endure the tension of the former, and it all comes together so wonderfully!
As a director, it’s certainly a step forward for Affleck. I think the only thing I want to see from him next is to go back to not appearing in his own film, or to only appear in a peripheral nature.
John says:
Nov 4, 2012
I agree completely with your remarks, Andrew. You’re spot-on, right down to the absurdity of the runway chase and escape sequence… which honestly, is the only part of the film I didn’t like. Beyond that, I think it’s an Oscar-quality movie.
Courtney says:
Nov 2, 2012
Great review! I saw this the other night, and it really surprised me. My level of anxiety rose steadily from the opening sequence, till an hour following the movie. Sure, some things were stretched, but Affleck directed another solid film. I’m drafting a review for this as way. Worth a second viewing…might go see it again.
Ryan McNeil says:
Nov 5, 2012
Seems like a sure-fire sign of great filmmaking if we find ourselves tensing up over something where we know the outcome, don’t ya think?
sati says:
Nov 6, 2012
Great review though I’m not sure I agree with how Iran was portrayed here – there was a scene where the hostages were brought seemingly for execution – sure they weren’t killed, but it was still a horrible thing to do, to make them believe they will die. I think Iranians were definetly portrayed as bad guys here. I really liked the film, it was well done and the last 30 minutes were terrific, very emotional and suspensful.
Ryan McNeil says:
Nov 6, 2012
Agreed, leading a prisoner to believe that they’re about to be executed is a terrible thing…but that’s the nature of war and torture sometimes, isn’t it?
When I say that Iran is portrayed in an even light, that’s to say that we are given a crystal clear explanation of what the uprising was about: That The Shah was a ruler who lived in luxury while his people went without, and that he was harboured by America upon going into exile. Consider how measured the woman who leads those Iranian press conferences sounds when making her statement: She isn’t sabre-rattling, she isn’t threatening, she is speaking very directly on a subject that seems rather clear.
Considering the film is an American one, it very easily could have made the Iranian position out to be more aggressive and villainous.
Glad to hear you dug it though!
filmdrivel says:
Nov 15, 2012
Damn good review. I like your point about how Iran and the protesters are portrayed, I was very relieved when the opening sequence explained the causes of the unrest and put it in context. I was fearing the same as you, a ‘black and white’ saving the hostages from evil re-telling. A big step forward for Affleck as a director.